Essay Guidelines

In response to Associate 2 levels of table headers with content, this page looks at different ways to markup up a complex table.

Original Table

Here is the solution which the topic starter proposed.

Components of an Essay
Component Purpose Description
Title Asks the question(s); describes the two areas or issues to be discussed Usually set by the course team. Contains key words about content and process.
Introduction The issue under discussion is spelled out.
  • Introduces the issues to be discussed.
  • Gives essential background information.
  • Focuses on and perhaps defines the key words
  • Gives a list or a route map of what is to follow
Main Body Arguments for - The points to support the case should be backed by evidence, with a new paragraph or section for each point.
Arguments against - The points against the case should be backed by evidence, with a new paragraph or section for each point.
Conclusions Conclusion or summary Your answer to the question. Includes reference to the issue in the title and a summary of how the points in the body of the essay have made a case both for and against the argument. It may be appropriate to come down in favour of one side of the argument

Using Headings 1

My rule of thumb is if you’re putting multiple complete sentences in table cells, it's not really a data table. If you’re putting block-level markup structures like <ul> in table cells, something’s not right!

I would tend to do this using headings, as below. I’m starting at <h3> so the document outline for this page remains logical. The actual page might start at a different level.

Components of an Essay

Title

Purpose
Asks the question(s); describes the two areas or issues to be discussed.
Description
Usually set by the course team. Contains key words about content and process.

Introduction

Purpose
The issue under discussion is spelled out.
Description
Introduces the issues to be discussed.
Gives essential background information.
Focuses on and perhaps defines the key words.
Gives a list or a route map of what is to follow.

Main Body

Arguments For
Description
The points to support the case should be backed by evidence, with a new paragraph or section for each point.
Arguments Against
Description
The points against the case should be backed by evidence, with a new paragraph or section for each point.

Conclusions

Purpose
Conclusion or summary.
Description
Your answer to the question. Includes reference to the issue in the title and a summary of how the points in the body of the essay have made a case both for and against the argument. It may be appropriate to come down in favour of one side of the argument.

Using Headings 2

I think the problems with the previous examples go beyond the markup to the actual content. Describing the purpose of the conclusion component as being “conclusion or summary” just so it has one illustrates this well, imho.

I suspect this is because the author tailored their content to the markup structure they had in mind (a table). The better practise is to tailor the markup to the content. Then maybe give them both a wiggle to make up for the gaps in HTML.

Here’s my attempt to write the content in a more natural way and then mark up what I wrote. Again, I’m starting at <h3> so the document outline for this page remains logical.

Components of an Essay

Title

Introduction

The issue under discussion is spelled out here:

Main Body

Consists of two sections:

Each section, the points should be backed by evidence. A new paragraph or section should be used for each point.

Conclusions

Your answer to the question. Includes:

It may be appropriate to come down in favour of one side of the argument.

Conclusion

Erm, there isn’t one really! Just that there are lots of ways to mark things up, especially if you are prepared to wiggle your content a little. Quite which approach is best is anyone’s guess...I’d probably side with the Using Headings 2 example.